Using Near-Storm Environment Data in the Warning Decision Making Process

Start Here


Contents

  1. Using Near-Storm Environment Data in the Warning Decision Making Process

  2. Using Near-storm environmental data in the warning process

  3. Using Near-storm environmental data in the warning process

  4. Using Near-storm environmental data in the warning process

  5. Using NSE Data

  6. Assessing the Near Storm Convective Environment

  7. Assessing the Near Storm Convective Environment

  8. Slide 8

  9. Impediments to Using NSE Data in WDM process

  10. More Problems

  11. More Problems

  12. Assessing the Near-Storm Convective Environment

  13. Objective Analysis Model Output

  14. Objective Analysis Output

  15. Example of MSAS Performance during May 31, 1998 Tornado Outbreak in NY

  16. 1800 UTC SkewT

  17. May 31, 1998 NY Tornado Outbreak

  18. May 31, 1998 Tornado Outbreak

  19. May 31, 1998 Tornado Outbreak

  20. May 31, 1998 Tornado Outbreak

  21. May 31, 1998 Tornado Outbreak

  22. May 31, 1998 Tornado Outbreak

  23. MSAS performance for May 31, 1998 Tornado Outbreak

  24. MSAS perfomance for May 31, 1998 Tornado Outbreak

  25. MSAS vs "observed"

  26. Summary

  27. Objective Analysis Output

  28. Slide 28

  29. LAPS Data Uses

  30. Example of LAPS Performance during May 31, 1998

  31. Example of LAPS Performance during May 31, 1998

  32. Example of LAPS Performance during May 31, 1998

  33. Example of LAPS Performance during May 31, 1998

  34. Example of LAPS Performance during May 31, 1998

  35. Example of LAPS Performance during May 31, 1998

  36. LAPS Performance-May 31,1998

  37. MSAS vs. LAPS

  38. Example of LAPS Performance during May 31, 1998

  39. Example of LAPS Performance during May 31, 1998

  40. NSE differences impacting Warning Decision (20Z KENX)

  41. LAPS Point Sounding Analysis

  42. NSE Impacts into WDM

  43. LAPS Point Sounding Analysis

  44. Severe Weather Summary

  45. Summary

  46. Case #2

  47. Case #2 : SE US

  48. Case #2 : SE US

  49. Case # 2: SE US

  50. CASE # 2: SE US

  51. Case #2- MSAS Output (LI)

  52. Case #2 - LAPS Output

  53. Case #2 : SE US

  54. Case #2

  55. Case #2

  56. Case #2 - added value of LAPS

  57. Case #2 - added value of LAPS

  58. Case #2 - evaluating grid point LAPS soundings (00Z)

  59. Storms in airmass "D"

  60. Storms in airmass "D"

  61. Point D - in tropical airmass

  62. Storms in airmass "E"

  63. Point E - in Theta-E ridge

  64. Storms in airmass "F"

  65. Storms in airmass "F"

  66. Storms in airmass "F": slightly cooler, more stable

  67. Storms in airmass "B"

  68. Storms in airmass "B"

  69. Storms in airmass "B"

  70. Storms in airmass "A"

  71. Storms in airmass "A"

  72. Storms in airmass "A"

  73. Storms in airmass "C"

  74. Storms in airmass "C"

  75. Storms in airmass "C"

  76. Storms in Airmass "C"

  77. Summary LAPS performance for SE US Svr Event

  78. Case#3

  79. Case #3- Assessing LAPS Helicity

  80. Case #3 LAPS sounding

  81. Case #3 -LAPS soundings

  82. Summary (preliminary)

  83. Overall Summary

  84. Slide 84


Comments or Questions?

Home page

Information:
Questions? Comments? Try the WDTB Forum.

Last updated:
February 15, 2001 (Thursday)

Download presentation file

Created with Corel Presentations